Refund Fraud: The $103+ Billion Threat & How Merchants Can Fight Back
Revenue loss due to refunds and product returns is an unavoidable part of operating in the retail space. To add insult to injury, though, a shocking percentage of the refund requests sent your way by customers will be cases of refund fraud.
According to the National Retail Federation, 15.8% of sales will be returned in 2025, culminating in $849.9 billion in returns. This figure is roughly in line with the 16.9% return rate recorded in 2024, when buyers returned $890 billion worth of merchandise.
As unfortunate as returns are for your top line, what’s worse are fraudulent returns, which occur when buyers maliciously abuse your return policy for their benefit. Recent data suggests that about 15% of returns are fraudulent, which means that merchants could be losing more than $120 billion annually to return abuse.
In this article, we take a closer look at how return fraud works, including why it happens, how it happens, and how you can spot and prevent fraudulent returns from overwhelming your business.
Recommended reading
- How Poshmark Scams Work: Understanding P2P Luxury Fraud
- Spear Phishing: Scam Prevention Tips for Buyers & Sellers
- Angler Phishing: Conning Customers at Business’s Expense
- How to Prevent Push Payment Fraud: Our Top Tips for 2026
- How to Identify Push Payment Fraud: 2026 Tips & Red Flags
- Push Payment Fraud Examples: Real Case Studies for 2026
What is Refund Fraud?
- Refund Fraud
Refund fraud, sometimes referred to as refund theft or a “whitehouse scam,” involves abusing a merchant’s policies to pursue a refund from a retailer and receive money or other goods without a valid reason to do so.
[noun]/rə • fənd • frôd/
Refund fraud is a form of first-party transaction fraud. However, it covers a broad range of possible scenarios. It can refer to any situation in which a bad actor exploits standard logistics, fulfillment, and customer service practices to get a refund without a good reason.
To illustrate this, imagine that a customer has two items from the same store. If only one item is eligible for a return, the buyer might swap the price tag on the items to get a refund that would not normally be allowed. Or, they might swap the tags to get a much larger refund value for one item compared to the other.
Taking action against refund fraud can also help you reduce the threat posed by chargeback abuse.
As for fraudulent returns, 2024 data offers some clues. That year, an estimated 15.14% of overall returns — about $103 billion worth — were deemed to be fraudulent.
Why Do Buyers Commit Refund Fraud?
Frankly, no one has the answer to this question. The reason why someone commits fraud could stem from any number of sources and factors. Not all of them need to be nefarious in nature, either.
Some customers commit fraud unintentionally; they genuinely didn’t know they weren’t entitled to a refund. Others turn to fraud because they are upset or angered by a shop’s policies. Others may have committed it accidentally one time, then decide to re-offend after realizing how it was to get away with.
That said, upticks in both criminal and friendly fraud often follow certain commercial patterns:
Ultimately, there’s no definitive answer for this question. It’s much easier to explain why merchants are hesitant to fight back, though.
Why Do So Many Scammers Get Away With Refund Fraud?
Given how much retailers lose every year to refund abuse, you’d think that stopping these attacks would be a top priority. However, customers often get away with refund fraud pretty easily.
There are a few reasons for this. First, there’s the fact that refund fraud is hard to identify. A customer can use any number of excuses to claim a return, and you have no way of verifying if they’re telling the truth. Second, you don’t want to alienate customers. After all, your reputation is one of your most important — and sensitive — assets. Angering customers can lead to reputational damage.
Finally, there’s the fact that it could be much, much worse.
For every $100 in refunds they processed, the average merchant lost $10.64 to refund fraudsters, according to the NRF.
If a buyer is committed to getting their money back, they won’t take “no” for an answer. They might file a chargeback if they don’t get their way. When this happens, you lose the merchandise, and the overhead associated with the purchase (shipping, fulfillment costs, etc.). You also get hit with a chargeback fee.
First-party fraud tactics like refund fraud and friendly fraud all exist within a tricky “gray area,” in which it can be very difficult to fraudsters from legitimate customers. Bad actors know this, and are counting on that gray area to commit their crime. They also count on your reluctance to accuse paying customers of doing anything wrong.
The 16 Most Common Refund Fraud Tactics (And How to Spot Them)
Like we alluded to above, there is a range of tactics that fall under the broad umbrella of “refund fraud.” Some are simple mistakes, while others are intentional and malicious fraud. Here are some of the most common refund fraud tactics you might see in your business:
How much do you stand to save by optimizing your return process?
Request a Demo
The True Cost of Return Fraud (It’s Not Just the Refund)
There are many costs associated with return fraud, including shipping, card processing, and labor and time spent processing returned goods. There is also the possibility that the item is returned in a non-resellable state, and needs to be written off.
The true extent of the financial damage caused by return fraud is usually two to three times the transaction value.
When a return fraud event occurs, you’re losing the revenue…plus a bunch of other direct and indirect costs. In other words, you’re essentially paying for the privilege of being robbed. To visualize this, let’s consider a hypothetical example where a buyer fraudulently returns a $100 item.
The direct costs of the scam hit you immediately: you lose the $100 in revenue that you refunded. On top of that, you lose the money you paid to ship the item to the buyer, additional return shipping costs, plus the payment processing fee, which is non-refundable, even in the event of a customer refund or chargeback.
Assuming that shipping costs were around $15 each way, and processing costs came to around $3, You are now out $133.
Your staff spends time processing the return request and your warehouse team needs to inspect the returned item and restock it. In total, that consumes $20 in labor costs. If the fraudster returned something in a non-usable state — like the item is bricked, or it was clearly used before being returned — you also face a total inventory write-off of $100.
Add these indirect costs to the $133 I outlined above, and that single fraudulent return request has cost you more than $250.
You can’t control platform-specific mandates, such as Amazon’s “Refund at First Scan” policy, which forces you to issue a refund before you have a chance to receive and inspect the returned item. But, you have absolute control over the terms of service and return policies that govern orders placed on your site, as well as the fraud detection tools that you deploy to protect your signup and checkout flows.
By upgrading your anti-fraud defenses and making strategic decisions about which returns to automate and which to scrutinize, you can stop the bleeding for a sizable portion of the orders you receive.
Return Request Red Flags: How to Spot Refund Fraud After the Sale
Return requests submitted right after an item arrives, vague complaints, repeat return requests, and submitting returns right before the deadline are all red flags for return fraud.
Although fraudsters try to fly under the radar, they often leave breadcrumbs.
Rejecting a fraudulent return request may lead to the situation escalating. The buyer, confident that they’re entitled to a refund, may escalate to a chargeback. And, given the dollar value and other details of the transaction, it may not be worth taking that risk. That said, recognizing these patterns early can still help you minimize your losses:
Immediate Return Requests
If a return is initiated within hours of delivery, claiming the item is damaged or defective, be suspicious. Chances are the buyer hasn’t even had time to open the box yet, let alone test the product, and simply wants to get their money back while keeping the (perfectly fine) item.
Vague Damage Descriptions
Legitimate customers usually explain why they claim an item is broken. Fraudsters rely on generic phrases like “it doesn't work” and often refuse to provide photos or video evidence when asked.
Returns Submitted Right Before Refund Windows Cutoffs
Watch for returns filed in the days right before your return window cutoff, whether it’s 30, 60, or 90 days. This behavior may suggest an effort by a fraudster to get the most use out of an item (a tactic known as “wardrobing”) before they ultimately send it back.
Serial Return Requests
Check the velocity of returns. While one or two return requests per year from a regular customer isn’t a big deal. But, several returns in a one-month window should warrant an immediate manual investigation.
Suspicious Communication
Fraudsters sometimes use aggression to force compliance or spur urgency. Be on high alert for customers who immediately threaten negative reviews, use legalistic language, or bring up promises made by third-party “refund services.”
Return Fraud Prevention Strategies That Actually Work
When it comes to preventing refund fraud, your eCommerce return policy is a good start. Effective prevention, however, ultimately requires a multilayered defense system.
Preventing return fraud is no easy task. Like all forms of first-party fraud, return fraud doesn’t appear to be illegitimate until the moment the customer acts. That said, there are some moves you can make that should help.
Here, I’ll explain how you can use a tiered strategy to filter out bad actors without adding friction for legitimate customers.
Tier 1: | Policy-Based Prevention
Ambiguity is the fraudster’s best friend. So, your first line of defense needs to be clarity.
You’ll want to draft a straightforward and unambiguous return policy that intentionally leaves little room for interpretation on your terms. For example, define clear time windows (e.g. 60 days for home decor items, 30 days for apparel, etc.) to prevent fraudsters from “renting” or wardrobing your items. Explicitly list non-returnable items and “Final Sale” merchandise to prevent policy abuse.
Clearly state who pays for return shipping. You’ll also want to spell out documentation requirements so that you shift the burden of proof to the buyer requesting the return. Make proof of purchase (via receipts or order numbers) mandatory for all returns. For damage claims, require photo or video evidence before issuing a return label.
Finally, when issuing the refund itself, strictly return funds to the original payment method or offer store credit only to stop fraudsters from liquidating stolen cards.
For high-value items, consider requiring a video unboxing for claims of damage or missing parts.
Tier 2: | Technology-Based Prevention
Policy controls aside, you’ll want to leverage automation to catch what your human staff miss. One way to do this is to secure your checkout environment.
In addition to the standard fraud prevention tools that should always be deployed at account creation and checkout, consider scanning serial numbers at the point of sale and again upon return. Doing so can effectively put an end to “switch fraud,” which occurs when a fraudster buys a new unit and returns an older or broken version. In a similar vein, weighing packages immediately before shipping — and comparing that strictly against the weight of the return package — is a low-tech but highly effective way to catch and deter empty-box scams.
High-tech fraud scoring tools can likewise be helpful. In addition to identifying potentially risky transactions by analyzing thousands of data points in your environment in real-time, these fraud detection machine learning systems can also learn from the data collected by other merchants. This allows you to flag bad actors who have a history of fraud with other merchants, even if they’re shopping at your store for the first time.
Tier 3: | Process-Based Prevention
Technology is ineffective without human oversight, which is why you’ll want to buttress your tech stack with a human firewall. For example, provide regular fraud awareness training to your support team so that they know how to spot signs of social engineering fraud and understand exactly when to escalate a suspicious ticket to a manager.
When receiving returned inventory, don’t shortcut the process by auto-restocking items. Every return should be opened, inspected, and tested — especially items like electronics and jewelry, which are commonly purchased and returned by scammers. Document the condition of returned items with photos to create an audit trail in case of a dispute.
You can further protect yourself by maintaining a database of return history. If a customer hits a threshold — say, three or more returns in 30 days — their account should automatically be flagged for manual review on all future orders.
Make Strategic Decisions
Remember: not every battle is worth fighting. So, use a decision matrix to standardize your response.
Refund fraud is a serious challenge. But, with the right strategies in place, you can eliminate losses and even grow your sales as a result.
Ready to learn more about how to stop fraud and chargebacks, recover your revenue, and avoid costly fees? Request a demo below to speak with one of our qualified chargeback experts today.
FAQs
How does refund scamming work?
Refund fraud, sometimes referred to as refund theft or return fraud, involves abusing a merchant’s policies to return goods that are ineligible for a refund to a retailer in exchange for money or other goods. Common tactics used for refund fraud including fake exchanges, "bricking," and wardrobing, to name just a few.
Is refund fraud illegal?
Statutes vary from one jurisdiction to another. In California, for instance, refund fraud is charged as petty theft under California Penal Code Section 484(a). Similar statutes will outline potential penalties in other localities, states, and countries.
Can I issue a refund to avoid chargeback fraud?
Yes. Refunding your buyer can allow you to avoid a costly chargeback. While refunds are not ideal, when looking at a chargeback versus a refund, a refund is definitely a better option. Check out our article on chargeback alerts to learn more about this practice.
Can simple policy changes prevent refund abuse?
Yes. By making your return policies more customer-friendly, and ensuring those policies are easy to find from every page on your site, you can keep refund abuse to a minimum.