Visa
Chargeback Reason Codes
A Complete Rundown on the Numeric Codes That Explain the Reasons for Visa Chargebacks
Received a Visa dispute notification? If so, the message probably included a numeric indicator called a dispute reason code.
Like the name implies, a dispute reason code is meant to help you understand the reason why the cardholder (or the cardholder’s bank) is disputing the charge in question. In theory, if you have the reason code, you should be able to figure out why a chargeback was filed, determine the best way to respond, and take steps to prevent similar disputes from happening in the future.
Each card network has their own system of reason codes in place, though. And, there are important variations in the rules and processes for each given reason; time limits may be different, or certain documents may be required or not required for a response to be accepted, depending on the specific claim being made.
Visa, for instance, subdivides their reason codes into four primary categories: fraud, authorization errors, processing errors, and customer disputes. These chargebacks are handled in totally different ways, depending on the workflow through which they get sent.
Learn more about Visa dispute workflows
Confused by Chargeback Reason Codes?
Download our convenient quick reference cheat sheets
No worries, though; below, we’ve compiled a complete list of current Visa chargeback reason codes, and provided a breakdown of what each code means. We’ll give you the time limits, acceptable evidence, and all the information you’ll need to figure out the cause of a dispute and how to submit a winning response.
Fraud
The following reason codes are used in cases of alleged card fraud. These disputes are submitted through the Visa “Allocation” workflow, meaning Visa will automatically assign liability to the party deemed responsible for the dispute:
EMV Liability Shift Counterfeit Fraud
10.1
EMV Liability Shift Counterfeit Fraud
Description
The cardholder claims a counterfeit chip card was used at a POS system where the transaction was not processed as a chip transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The transaction in question was a card-present transaction made using an EMV chip card. But, either your merchant terminal was not set up to accept EMV chip cards, or your card processor did not transmit the full chip data to Visa.
How to Respond
Provide documentation showing that the transaction took place at a chip terminal, the chip in question was read, and that the chip data was fully transmitted.
Prevention Steps
- Upgrade to compliant terminals
- Make sure to obtain the correct Cardholder Verification Method (CVM), such as a signature or PIN
- Take an imprint (either electronic or manual) for every card-present transaction
- Train staff on the proper handling of terminal issues
EMV Liability Shift Non-Counterfeit Fraud
10.2
EMV Liability Shift Non-Counterfeit Fraud
Description
An EMV chip card was used to complete a transaction. But, the cardholder claims that the transaction was unauthorized, as the card used was either lost or stolen, or was not received as issued.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The transaction in question was a card-present transaction made using an EMV chip card. But, either your merchant terminal was not set up to accept EMV chip cards, or your card processor did not transmit the full chip data to Visa.
How to Respond
Provide documentation showing that the transaction took place at a chip terminal, the chip in question was read, and that the chip data was fully transmitted.
Prevention Steps
- Upgrade to EMV PIN-compliant terminals
- Always obtain the appropriate Cardholder Verification Method (CVM)
- Take an imprint (either electronic or manual) for every card-present transaction
- Train staff on the proper handling of terminal issues
Other Fraud — Card-Present Environment
10.3
Other Fraud — Card-Present Environment
Description
The transaction took place in a card-present environment, but card information was manually keyed in. The cardholder subsequently claims that they didn’t authorize or participate in the transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
Merchant did not ensure that the card was either swiped or that the chip was read; merchant did not obtain manual card imprint on a key-entered transaction; a card-not-present transaction was not identified as such.
How to Respond
Provide documentation showing that the card’s magnetic stripe or chip was read. Or, if you made a manual imprint of the card using a card imprinter, provide a copy of the imprint.
Prevention Steps
- Upgrade to compliant terminals
- Make sure all card-present transactions are either chip-read or magnetic stripe-read
- Obtain an imprint or perform additional validation, such as PIN
Other Fraud — Card-absent Environment
10.4
Other Fraud — Card-absent Environment
Description
The transaction took place in a card-not-present environment, and cardholder claims that they didn’t authorize or participate in the transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The person on the other end of the transaction was unauthorized, and was using the cardholder’s information fraudulently. Or, the cardholder authorized the purchase, but believes the transaction to be fraudulent due to an unclear or confusing merchant descriptor.
How to Respond
Provide documentation showing the transaction was Visa Secure-authenticated. Or, show that the cardholder has completed two or more transactions (settled more than 120 calendar days prior to the dispute) which were not reported as fraud, and which have at least two data elements (device ID, device fingerprint, or the IP address) in common with the disputed transaction.
Prevention Steps
- Always request authorization for mail order, telephone order, internet, and recurring transactions, regardless of the dollar amount
- Obtain additional validation, such as an imprint or PIN
- Clearly and properly identify card present and card absent transactions
- Clearly and properly identify card present and card absent transactions
Visa Fraud Monitoring Program
10.5
Visa Fraud Monitoring Program
Description
The Visa Fraud Monitoring Program (VFMP) flagged the transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
Your business has been entered into the Visa Fraud Monitoring Program, and under the restrictions imposed as part of the VFMP, the issuer was allowed to dispute the transaction.
How to Respond
Responses are only allowed if the issuer has already disputed the transaction, and you have already accepted the dispute; in other words, a duplicate dispute. Or, if you’ve already issued a credit to the cardholder to offset the transaction being disputed.
Prevention Steps
- Keep accurate records
Authorization Errors
The following reason codes are used when an error was made in the process of requesting authorization for a transaction. These disputes are submitted through the Visa “Allocation” workflow, meaning Visa will automatically assign liability to the party deemed responsible for the dispute:
Card Recovery Bulletin
11.1
Card Recovery Bulletin
Description
The issuer determined that you did not obtain authorization for a transaction on the transaction date, and the card number used was listed by Visa in the Card Recovery Bulletin (CRB).
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
75 days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
You processed a transaction without first checking the Card Recovery Bulletin.
How to Respond
If the transaction took place at an EMV-compliant terminal, you can submit documentation to prove this was the case.
Prevention Steps
- Always check the Card Recovery Bulletin (CRB) when required
Declined Authorization
11.2
Declined Authorization
Description
You processed a transaction, but the issuer claims to have sent a Decline or Pickup response to your authorization request, meaning there was no authorization given.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
75 days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
This may happen if you get a Decline or Pickup response to an authorization request. But, you send the transaction in your capture file anyway, without attempting another authorization request.
How to Respond
Provide documentation from your processor showing that the transaction was authorized.
Prevention Steps
- Obtain authorization
- Discontinue the transaction if a card has been declined
- Ask for an alternate form of payment
No Authorization/Late Presentment
11.3
No Authorization/Late Presentment
Description
This could signify one of two things. First, it may mean you processed a transaction without receiving necessary authorization. Or, it could signal that the authorization had expired by the time you submitted the transaction for processing.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
75 days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
This is usually received for one of three reasons: you never obtained authorization for a transaction; you processed a transaction for an amount greater than what was authorized; or, you did not submit a transaction for processing in time before an authorization expired.
How to Respond
Provide documentation from your processor showing that the transaction was authorized. For late presentment, you can show proof that the transaction date initially used to process the transaction was incorrect, or provide a copy of the receipt showing the transaction was completed within the time limit.
Prevention Steps
- Always authorize every transaction in accordance with the Visa Rules
- Obtain authorization on the day of the transaction
- Don't include the tip on a previously authorized amount
Processing Errors
The following reason codes are used when an error was made during the processing of a transaction. These disputes are submitted through the Visa “collaboration” workflow, meaning Visa will not automatically assign liability to the party deemed responsible for the dispute. Instead, there will be more opportunity for response before the Visa chargeback reason code is formalized into a chargeback.
Incorrect Transaction Code
12.2
Incorrect Transaction Code
Description
The wrong transaction code was used. For example, you meant to send a credit to a customer, but accidentally debited their account instead.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
You processed a debit instead of a credit, processed a credit instead of processing a reversal, or in some other way processed a transaction that differed from the obtained authorization.
How to Respond
Provide documentation showing the transaction was processed correctly as a credit or debit. Or, given explanation as to why the credit was not a result of a processing error.
Prevention Steps
- Double check calculations and the final transaction amount before processing
- Train staff on the proper procedures for processing credits, debits, and reversals
Incorrect Currency
12.3
Incorrect Currency
Description
The merchant made one or more errors related to the transaction currency.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The transaction currency differs from the currency transmitted through Visa; the cardholder was not advised or did not agree that Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC) would occur.
How to Respond
If the cardholder claims they didn’t agree to Dynamic Currency Conversion, you need to provide evidence that the cardholder actively chose DCC. You can also provide a copy of the transaction receipt.
Prevention Steps
- Inform cardholders of the use of currency conversion and applicable fees
- Always give the cardholder the option to make the purchase using local currency
- Train your sales staff on proper procedures for transaction using a different currency
Incorrect Account Number
12.4
Incorrect Account Number
Description
The account number in the authorization does not match the account number used in the transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The transaction was processed to an incorrect account number; the adjustment was processed more than 45 days from transaction date; an adjustment was posted to a "closed" or "non-sufficient funds" account more than 10 days after the transaction date; an adjustment was processed more than once for the same transaction; the cardholder disputes the validity of the adjustment.
How to Respond
If the account number attached to the dispute matches the one you have on file, then provide a copy of the receipt. You may also provide a copy of the authorization log.
Prevention Steps
- As far as possible, swipe card or read chip for transactions
- Process all transactions and adjustments in a timely manner
- Double-check numbers before processing
- Train staff on the proper procedures for processing transactions
Incorrect Amount
12.5
Incorrect Amount
Description
The amount in the authorization does not match the amount from the transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
An error was made while entering the transaction amount manually, or the amount of the transaction was changed without the cardholder's consent.
How to Respond
Provide supporting documentation showing that the transaction amount is correct, like a copy of the transaction receipt.
Prevention Steps
- As far as possible, swipe card or read chip for transactions
- Double check calculations and the final transaction amount before processing
- Don't change the transaction amount without the cardholder's consent
Duplicate Processing
12.6.1
Duplicate Processing
Description
A single transaction was processed two or more times.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The merchant tries to submit multiple batches at one time; the transaction has multiple receipts; the transaction is duplicated in the merchant's system; the transaction was processed but the cardholder paid for the same merchandise or service by other means.
How to Respond
Provide documentation showing that the two transactions in question are separate.
Prevention Steps
- Review transaction receipts before depositing
- Submit a batch only one time
- Void/credit any duplicate transactions
- Deposit receipts with one acquirer
- Train staff on the proper procedures for handling credits
12.6.2
Paid by Other Means
Paid by Other Means
Description
You charged the customer’s card. But, the customer claims to have already paid for the transaction in question using another payment method, like cash, check, or another card.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The cardholder gave you their card, or you already had their card information on file. You charged the customer’s card, but the cardholder then decided to use a different payment method. However, you did not cancel the first transaction.
How to Respond
Provide supporting documentation showing that the transaction amount is correct, and that no other transaction method was used. If the other transaction was for a different, separate purchase, provide documentation to show that both payments were for different goods or services.
Prevention Steps
- Review transaction receipts before depositing
- Submit a batch only one time
- Void/credit any duplicate transactions
- Deposit receipts with one acquirer
- Train staff on the proper procedures for handling credits
Invalid Data
12.7
Invalid Data
Description
An authorization was obtained using invalid or incorrect data.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
75 days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The merchant submits an authorization request containing an incorrect transaction date, MCC, merchant or transaction type indicator, country or state code, or other required field.
How to Respond
Offer sales records or other documentation showing the transaction was authorized using valid data.
Prevention Steps
- Double-check all required fields
Customer Disputes
The following reason codes are used in cases in which the cardholder disputes the transaction for a specific reason. These disputes are submitted through the Visa “collaboration” workflow, meaning Visa will not automatically assign liability to the party deemed responsible for the dispute. Instead, there will be more opportunity for response before the Visa chargeback reason code is formalized into a chargeback.
Merchandise / Services Not Received
13.1
Merchandise/Services Not Received
Description
Cardholder claims goods or services were not received or not received by the agreed upon date.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
You delayed delivery; you charged the cardholder prior to shipping or delivery; you shipped the goods on time, or had the product available for pick-up as promised, but didn’t inform the customer.
How to Respond
Show documentation proving that the cardholder (or another authorized person) received the merchandise as agreed. If the projected delivery date has not yet passed, then provide documentation showing that projected delivery date. Additional response guidelines are in place for specific situations, including cryptocurrency, NFT, or airline ticket purchases.
Prevention Steps
- Provide goods and services as promised
- Don't charge the cardholder's account until after the product has been shipped
- Let cardholders know when the product has been shipped and the estimated date for delivery
- Use tracking and delivery confirmation
- Make sure products are available for pick up when specified
Canceled Recurring Transaction
13.2
Canceled Recurring Transaction
Description
The cardholder claims to have been charged for a canceled recurring transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The cardholder withdraws permission to charge the account or cancels payment for subscription; cardholder or issuing bank cancels the account; you neglected to cancel a recurring transaction; you processed a transaction after being notified the cardholder's account was closed.
How to Respond
You can provide proof that the cardholder used services after the date on which they withdrew permission to bill them, but prior to the dispute processing date.
Prevention Steps
- Terminate recurring transactions when the cardholder requests cancelation
- Consider a no-strings-attached cancelation policy
- Use Visa Account Updater to gain access to new card information so transactions aren't attempted on closed accounts
- Don't increase the transaction amount without the cardholder's consent
- Don't prematurely bill the cardholder
- Send notifications for upcoming charges
Not as Described or Defective Merchandise / Services
13.3
Not as Described or Defective Merchandise/Services
Description
The cardholder claims that the goods or services were defective or damaged on arrival, or were not as described at the time of purchase.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
The merchandise was damaged in transit; the merchandise does not match your description; the cardholder disputes the quality of the product.
How to Respond
Provide specific information to refute the cardholder’s claims. This can include invoice, contract, etc. Clearly address each point and complaint that the cardholder has made, and be aware that you may need a neutral third-party opinion in some cases. If the customer claims to have returned the merchandise, advise that you have not received the return yet, or show proof the cardholder agreed to a repair or replacement.
Prevention Steps
- Double check orders to ensure the correct item is shipped
- Package items carefully to avoid damage during shipping
- Provide honest, detailed product descriptions
- Accept returns from cardholders and issue credit promptly
- Never sell counterfeit products
Counterfeit Merchandise
13.4
Counterfeit Merchandise
Description
The merchandise was identified as counterfeit by the owner of the intellectual property, a government agency, or a neutral third-party expert.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
You're (knowingly or unknowingly) selling counterfeit merchandise. Note that this reason code supersedes your return policy.
How to Respond
Provide specific information proving that the goods in question are legitimate.
Prevention Steps
- Certify the authenticity of all goods
Misrepresentation
13.5
Misrepresentation
Description
The cardholder claims a purchased item or service was misrepresented and alleges false advertising.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
Your product descriptions are vague, inaccurate, or insufficient. These claims are most common for timeshare resellers, debt consolidation, credit repair, foreclosure relief services, and investment products. Note that this reason code supersedes your return policy.
How to Respond
Provide specific information showing you didn’t misrepresent your terms or products. If the cardholder agreed to future transactions (trial periods, promotional periods, etc.), provide documentation showing the cardholder agreed to future transactions and that you notified the cardholder of an upcoming charge at least 7 days in advance.
Prevention Steps
- Create honest, detailed product descriptions
- Add photos/videos to descriptions
- Never sell counterfeit products
Credit Not Processed
13.6
Credit Not Processed
Description
The customer claims a credit was due but never processed.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
You didn’t credit the account; you issued a credit, but not in time to be posted to the customer’s most recent statement; the customer misunderstood the return policy; you processed a transaction receipt that should have been voided.
How to Respond
Provide documentation and refute the validity of any documents offered by the cardholder.
Prevention Steps
- Share the return policy with the cardholder before completing the transaction
- Issue credits promptly
- Notify the cardholder when the credit has been issued
Cancelled Merchandise / Services
13.7
Cancelled Merchandise/Services
Description
The cardholder is claiming that they returned merchandise or cancelled services, but the credit has not appeared on the cardholder’s statement.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
You have not yet issued a due credit; you issued the credit but it hasn't posted to the customer's account yet; the customer misunderstood or was never clear on the return policy.
How to Respond
Provide documentation showing your return or cancellation policy was properly disclosed at the time of sale, and the cardholder agreed to it.
Prevention Steps
- Clearly share the return policy with the cardholder before completing the transaction
- In cases of limited returns, "no returns" or similar words should be on all copies of the transaction receipts and supplied to the cardholder
- Issue credits promptly
- Always notify the cardholder when the credit has been issued
Original Credit Transaction Not Accepted
13.8
Original Credit Transaction Not Accepted
Description
The original credit was not accepted.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
Either the cardholder does not accept the credit, or the issuer does not allow Original Credit Transactions (OCT's) on certain types of cards due to local law.
How to Respond
Supply documentation showing the original credit transaction was reversed.
Prevention Steps
- Maintain accurate records
- Familiarize yourself with usage laws for areas you serve
Non-Receipt of Cash at an ATM
13.9
Non-Receipt of Cash at an ATM
Description
Cardholder did not receive the full cash withdrawal at an ATM.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
30 days
Typical Causes
Faulty ATM
How to Respond
Provide a copy of the ATM cash disbursement transaction record. This should contain a payment credential, or transaction time, or indicator showing successful cash disbursement.
Prevention Steps
- Reconcile ATMs in a timely manner
- Adjust any out of balance machines promptly
- In case of a discrepancy, process a credit/reversal as soon as possible