
UnionPay
Chargeback Reason Codes
UnionPay Chargeback Reason Codes: A List of Numeric Codes Used to Explain the Reasons for UnionPay Chargebacks
UnionPay is the world’s largest card payment network by cards issued and total transaction value. Based in Shanghai, the company is technically not operated directly by the Chinese government. However, it is a state-backed financial institution owned largely by state-controlled banks and overseen by the People’s Bank of China.
Understanding reason codes for UnionPay can be tricky, as the company operates as two different entities: UnionPay is the parent company, with operations that cover mainland China. UnionPay International (UPI) is a subsidiary that handles global operations, including card acceptance, from more than 180 countries.
UnionPay also has what’s called a reciprocal acceptance partnership with Discover Financial. Basically, it’s an agreement that cards issued on either network can be accepted using the other’s infrastructure. That impacts the chargeback process; when UnionPay International transactions get routed through Discover’s infrastructure, any resulting chargebacks will be filed using the same reason codes as a Discover card chargeback. Transactions processed directly within China, however, often use a different, shorter set of codes.
It’s actually not as confusing as it sounds. Below, I’ve outlined the reason codes used by UnionPay. Clicking on any individual code will give you a brief explanation of how it works. I’ve also marked each one with both the global (UPI) code and the one commonly used by domestic China (Non-UPI). UnionPay also uses 4-digit codes (4515, 4562, etc.) for integration, reconciliation, or processor-level debugging. Those are not typically used in merchant-facing chargeback documentation.
The complete list of UnionPay chargeback reason codes is not posted publicly by the company. Some information was collected through reliable acquirer/processor reporting, rather than directly from UnionPay.
Confused by Chargeback Reason Codes?
Download our convenient quick reference cheat sheets
Fraud
UA01
Fraud / Card-Present Environment
UA01
Fraud / Card-Present Environment
Domestic Code
Fraud/01
Category
Fraud Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims they did not authorize a card-present transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Card-present transaction by unauthorized user
- Lost or stolen card used at POS
- Counterfeit or fraudulently obtained card used
Prevention Steps
- Use EMV chip processing
- Verify card security features
- Monitor high-risk transactions
- Train staff on suspicious transaction indicators
Evidence to Respond
- Signed transaction receipt
- Authorization approval code
- EMV transaction data
- POS transaction log
UA02
Fraud / Card-Not-Present Environment
UA02
Fraud / Card-Not-Present Environment
Domestic Code
Fraud/02
Category
Fraud Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims they did not authorize or participate in a card-not-present transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Stolen card details used online
- Account takeover or credential compromise
- Unauthorized use of stored card credentials
Prevention Steps
- Use AVS and CVV verification
- Monitor transaction velocity and anomalies
- Implement customer authentication controls
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipt or invoice
- AVS/CVV match results
- IP address and device data
- Delivery confirmation
UA05
Fraud / Counterfeit Chip Transaction
UA05
Fraud / Counterfeit Chip Transaction
Domestic Code
Fraud/05
Category
Fraud Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims a chip card transaction was fraudulent, often involving a counterfeit or cloned card.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Counterfeit card used in fallback (magstripe) transaction
- Chip read failure leading to swipe fallback
- Compromised card data used to create counterfeit card
Prevention Steps
- Use EMV-compliant terminals
- Require chip transactions instead of swipe whenever possible
- Obtain the correct Cardholder Verification Method (CVM)
Evidence to Respond
- EMV transaction data
- Terminal capability documentation
- Authorization approval code
- POS transaction log
UA06
Fraud / Chip-and-PIN Transaction
UA06
Fraud / Chip-and-PIN Transaction
Domestic Code
Fraud/06
Category
Fraud Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims a chip-and-PIN card-present transaction was unauthorized.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Stolen chip card used with PIN bypass
- Counterfeit card used in fallback (magstripe) transaction
- Unauthorized use where PIN was entered
- Cardholder dispute despite successful PIN verification
Prevention Steps
- Use PIN-enabled EMV terminals
- Require PIN verification when prompted
- Monitor for fallback or CVM inconsistencies
Evidence to Respond
- EMV transaction data
- PIN verification result
- Terminal transaction log
- Authorization approval code
UA10
Request Transaction Receipt (Swiped Transaction)
UA10
Request Transaction Receipt (Swiped Transaction)
Domestic Code
N/A
Category
Fraud Dispute
Description
Issuer requests transaction documentation for a card-present transaction the cardholder claims may be fraudulent.
Legacy Code
This code will work, but is largely obsolete.
UA11
Cardholder Claims Fraud (Swiped Transaction, No Signature)
UA11
Cardholder Claims Fraud (Swiped Transaction, No Signature)
Domestic Code
Fraud/11
Category
Fraud Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims a card-present transaction processed via swipe was fraudulent and lacks valid cardholder verification.
Legacy Code
This code will work, but is largely obsolete.
Authorization
AT
Authorization Required / Authorization Issue
AT
Authorization Required / Authorization Issue
Domestic Code
Authorization/01
Category
Authorization Dispute
Description
The transaction was not completed in accordance with the authorization requirement.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Authorization obtained but conditions not followed
- Transaction exceeded authorization limits or parameters
- Incorrect handling of partial or conditional approvals
Prevention Steps
- Obtain complete authorization for all transactions
- Validate approval details before completing transaction
- Ensure POS terminals are properly configured
Evidence to Respond
- Authorization approval code
- Authorization log record
- POS transaction record
- Transaction receipt
AW
Authorization Error / Invalid Authorization
AW
Authorization Error / Invalid Authorization
Domestic Code
Authorization/02
Category
Authorization Dispute
Description
Transaction processed with an authorization error or without valid issuer approval.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Incorrect authorization amount or data
- Mismatch between authorization and cleared transaction
- Incorrect authorization procedures
Prevention Steps
- Match authorization details to final transaction
- Validate authorization data before settlement
- Monitor authorization responses
Evidence to Respond
- Authorization approval code
- Authorization logs
- POS transaction record
- Transaction receipt
NA
No Authorization
NA
No Authorization
Domestic Code
Authorization/03
Category
Authorization Dispute
Description
Transaction processed without obtaining issuer authorization.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Merchant failed to request authorization
- Offline transaction submitted without approval
- Terminal configuration error
Prevention Steps
- Obtain authorization for all transactions
- Ensure terminals connect to authorization networks
- Monitor authorization activities and failures
Evidence to Respond
- Authorization logs
- POS transaction record
- Transaction receipt
- Terminal configuration record
EX
Expired Card
EX
Expired Card
Domestic Code
Authorization/04
Category
Authorization Dispute
Description
Transaction processed using a card that was expired at the time of the transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Merchant accepted expired card
- Manual entry bypassed expiration validation
Prevention Steps
- Verify card expiration date
- Use terminals that validate card data automatically
- Avoid manual card entry when possible
- Train staff to reject expired cards
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipt
- Authorization response (if applicable)
- POS transaction log
Processing Error
DA
Duplicate / Processing Error
DA
Duplicate / Processing Error
Domestic Code
Processing/01
Category
Processing Dispute
Description
Cardholder disputes duplicate or multiple charges for a single transaction.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Duplicate transaction processing
- POS or system error causing multiple postings
- Transaction processed multiple times
Prevention Steps
- Implement duplicate transaction controls
- Verify transaction amounts before resubmission
- Reconcile POS batches regularly
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipts (showing distinct transactions)
- POS batch records
- Authorization records
- Transaction processing logs
DP
Duplicate Processing
DP
Duplicate Processing
Domestic Code
Processing/02
Category
Processing Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims that the same transaction was charged more than once.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Same transaction submitted multiple times
- POS system error without checking status
- Merchant reprocessed transaction
Prevention Steps
- Implement duplicate transaction controls
- Verify transaction status before reprocessing
- Reconcile POS batches regularly
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipts
- POS batch records
- Transaction logs
IN
Incorrect Amount
IN
Incorrect Amount
Domestic Code
Processing/03
Category
Processing Dispute
Description
Cardholder disputes the transaction because the amount charged differs from the agreed purchase amount.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Amount entered incorrectly at POS
- Billing error during processing
- Mismatch between authorized and settled amount
Prevention Steps
- Verify transaction amounts before submission
- Train staff on POS entry procedures
- Match authorization and settlement amounts
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipt
- Itemized invoice
- POS transaction log
LP
Late Presentment
LP
Late Presentment
Domestic Code
Processing/04
Category
Processing Dispute
Description
Transaction submitted for clearing after the allowable time period.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Merchant delayed transaction submission
- Late batch submission
- Merchant processing delays
Prevention Steps
- Submit transactions promptly
- Close POS batches daily
- Monitor settlement processing timelines
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipt
- Authorization approval code
- Settlement records
- POS batch logs
Consumer Dispute
NF
Non-Receipt of Goods or Services
NF
Non-Receipt of Goods or Services
Domestic Code
Consumer/01
Category
Consumer Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims the purchased goods or services were not received.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Goods not delivered
- Service not provided
- Delivery delayed beyond expected timeframe
Prevention Steps
- Provide shipment tracking
- Confirm delivery with signature when possible
- Communicate delivery timelines clearly
Evidence to Respond
- Shipping confirmation
- Delivery confirmation or signature proof
- Order confirmation or invoice
- Customer communication records
NC
Canceled Transaction
NC
Canceled Transaction
Domestic Code
Consumer/02
Category
Consumer Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims the transaction was canceled but the charge was still processed.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Cancellation processed but refund not issued
- Cancellation not recorded correctly
- Merchant policy unclear or misunderstood
Prevention Steps
- Process cancellations promptly
- Confirm cancellations with customers
- Maintain clear cancellation policies
Evidence to Respond
- Cancellation records
- Refund transaction record
- Customer communication records
- Transaction receipt
- Refund record timestamps
RM
Returned Merchandise
RM
Returned Merchandise
Domestic Code
Consumer/03
Category
Consumer Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims merchandise was returned but the refund was not issued.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Returned goods not processed for refund
- Refund processing delays
- Return not properly recorded
Prevention Steps
- Process refunds after returned goods are received
- Track returned merchandise
- Provide return confirmations
Evidence to Respond
- Return authorization record
- Proof of refund
- Return receipt or tracking confirmation
- Customer communication records
- Tracking or receipt number
RG
Defective or Not as Described
RG
Defective or Not as Described
Domestic Code
Consumer/04
Category
Consumer Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims goods or services were defective or significantly different from what was described.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Product quality issues
- Misleading product descriptions
- Service delivered did not match expectations or terms
Prevention Steps
- Provide accurate product descriptions
- Maintain product quality control
- Document service agreements
- Provide clear product and service terms
Evidence to Respond
- Product description or advertisement
- Transaction receipt or invoice
- Delivery confirmation
- Customer communication records
CD
Credit Not Processed
CD
Credit Not Processed
Domestic Code
Consumer/05
Category
Consumer Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims a refund was due but was not issued by the merchant.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Merchant failed to process refund
- Refund delayed beyond expected timeframe
- Miscommunication regarding return eligibility
Prevention Steps
- Process refunds promptly
- Maintain clear refund policies
- Confirm refunds with customers
Evidence to Respond
- Refund transaction record
- Proof of refund issued
- Customer communication records
PM
Paid by Other Means
PM
Paid by Other Means
Domestic Code
Consumer/06
Category
Consumer Dispute
Description
Cardholder claims the transaction was paid using another payment method.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Cardholder paid using cash or another card
- Duplicate payment methods applied
- Billing confusion at POS
Prevention Steps
- Confirm payment method before processing
- Avoid duplicate payment entries
- Provide clear payment receipts
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipt
- POS transaction record
- Payment records
- Authorization approval code
PI
No-Show / Cancellation Policy
PI
No-Show / Cancellation Policy
Domestic Code
Consumer/07
Category
Consumer Dispute
Description
Cardholder disputes a charge related to a no-show or cancellation fee.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Customer disputes cancellation fee
- Cancellation policy not clearly disclosed
- Reservation canceled but fee applied per policy
Prevention Steps
- Disclose cancellation policies clearly
- Obtain customer agreement to policy
- Send reservation confirmations
Evidence to Respond
- Reservation confirmation
- Cancellation policy disclosure
- Customer agreement record
- Transaction receipt
- Payment record for cancellation fee
Miscellaneous Chargebacks
AP
Fraud Application / Account Issue
AP
Fraud Application / Account Issue
Domestic Code
N/A
Category
Fraud Dispute
Description
Issuer identifies the transaction as related to a fraudulent account or application, whether cardholder-initiated or system-detected fraud.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Account opened using stolen identity
- Fraudulent card application
- Identity verification failure after passing basic steps
Prevention Steps
- Implement identity verification controls
- Use fraud detection screening
- Monitor suspicious account activity
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction records, which may not be transaction-specific if account-level fraud is alleged
- Account registration information
- Authorization records
- Fraud screening results
IC
Issuer Chargeback
IC
Issuer Chargeback
Domestic Code
N/A
Category
Issuer-initiated Chargeback
Description
Issuer initiates a chargeback based on internal investigation or dispute review.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Issuer investigation outcome
- Fraud detection by issuer
- Network rule or policy violation
Prevention Steps
- Maintain transaction documentation
- Follow authorization procedures
- Monitor fraud indicators
Evidence to Respond
- Transaction receipt
- Authorization approval code
- POS or gateway transaction logs
- Customer records
RN2
Second Presentment / Reversal
RN2
Second Presentment / Reversal
Domestic Code
N/A
Category
Transaction Processing
Description
Represents resubmission after chargeback or dispute outcome.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Issuer or Acquirer representment or reversal
- Dispute review outcome
- Transaction reversal procedures
Prevention Steps
- Maintain detailed transaction records
- Track dispute responses carefully
- Monitor chargeback processing
Evidence to Respond
- Previous dispute documentation
- Transaction records
- Authorization logs
- Correspondence records
- Representment logs
AA
Arbitration / Final Resolution
AA
Arbitration / Final Resolution
Domestic Code
N/A
Category
Dispute Resolution
Description
Final dispute escalation stage where the network determines liability between issuer and acquirer. Final network determination may override prior representment.
Time Limit
(Issuer/Cardholder)
120 Days recommended
Time Limit
(Acquirer/Merchant)
n/a
Typical
Causes
- Dispute unresolved after representment
- Conflicting or insufficient evidence in earlier stages
- Escalation to network review for final liability determination
Prevention Steps
- Maintain complete dispute documentation
- Respond promptly to chargebacks
- Follow network dispute procedures
Evidence to Respond
- Full dispute case documentation
- Transaction records
- Previous chargeback correspondence
- All merchant-supporting documentation from previous stages
As mentioned at the beginning of the section, reason codes can be helpful, but they don’t offer much insight into the true source of chargebacks. Chargebacks911® combines innovative technology and human expertise to identify chargeback sources and assemble winning cases.
You don’t need to rely on UnionPay chargeback reason codes. Chargebacks911 is the answer for genuine, long-term chargeback reduction. Click here to learn more.